TMI The Perversion of Contemporary Philosophy in Education insetPhilosophy is the root of education. Without the schools created by Plato and Aristotle (both based on Pythagoras) we would not have Western education. We owe our entire wealth of knowledge—and reason itself, for that matter—to its edifice. And yet, something has happened to education lately, hasn’t it?

Education has lost the mystery it once held, traded it for economy. As long as something is useful, it is heralded as virtuous. How did utility and virtue come to be equated? How did they become synonymous? They mean different things. On the one hand, utility sounds sterile. It is results-driven. It quantifies without considering quality. Virtue, on the other hand, is venerable, holy, sacred. It qualifies all that we do. Without virtue we are nothing. We are animals. Without virtue we may as well bend the knee to all tyrants, both spiritual and physical; we may as well throw down our weapons and accept the heavy bonds of slavery forevermore.

Contemporary philosophy unfortunately is a perversion of its former glory. No longer are we gathered at the feet of Plato to hear of his Forms. Instead we are discussing banalities. Pro-life vs. pro-choice. Capitalism vs. Communism. Teleology vs. Deontology. Philosophy departments across the nation (and presumably the world) are turning out a new breed of professional philosopher, so far removed from the anti-materialist sentiments of Pythagoras, Socrates and Plato that we should not even consider the two of the same species.

Perhaps what I am looking for is the religious philosopher. I am in search of a modern Hegel. The question is: where did such men go? Have they all been subsumed by the age of economic reductionism? Are they too busy trying to maintain their positions as adjunct professors to care about anything as silly as virtue? Have they all become dreaded Last Men? This extends further than Philosophy; take education in general. What does it do, other than serve the interests of ultra-wealthy investors? It functions only to create a perennial slave-class. The qualifying factor of education has been lost. Its virtue has gone missing.

I long for a return to learning simply for its own sake. Who can put a price on developing one’s rational nature? Is there any activity on which we can bestow more honor? If there is any duty one has to himself, it is that of education. Knowledge, though it may be a fruit which is forbidden, is always worthy of pursuit. It is an opposing force of Capitalism. Capitalism requires cheap labor to keep itself afloat, and intelligence runs counter to servility. It’s only a matter of time before the entire world is educated to the point of acute self-awareness. Following that awareness will be social revolution. Thus the Dialectic marches forth.

How can we begin to transform education in Western nations? We have allowed her to be defiled. She has been demoted from goddess to whore. She now serves the interests of the global elite. How can she again be sanctified? Who will cleanse her altar, and how?

The clock is ticking. It’s up to us.

Be Sociable, Share!

Tags: , , , , , ,

   THE MERITOCRACY PARTY is creating a world where every child is guaranteed an equal opportunity to thrive. If you share this ideal, consider making a small donation to fund our servers, or join the MERITOCRACY INTERNATIONAL as a volunteer.

   We are artists, activists, writers, and intellectuals who crave an authentic and fair world. We feel the anomie of this age but we have a plan to fix it. Join us and create a better future‒make your grandkids proud.

Meritocracy Party

3 Responses to “The Perversion of Contemporary Philosophy in Education” Subscribe

  1. Brett Owers May 26, 2014 at 5:23 pm #

    I feel as though the meritocratic pride themselves on reason, logic, and intellect, yet oftentimes don’t use what we pride ourselves on in the first place! If we are to show the world that education is a never ending journey rather than a 16 year institution than we are going to need funding. Activism is incredibly important, but I feel as though the current system has it flaws. It is possible to get ahead. And if we are to be logical, we must first recognize that to appeal to the masses, so that the technological progress that I know we are all incredibly eager about, we must beat the old system at it’s own game. Is it not our responsibility as the intellectual to diffuse our knowledge in the smoothest way possible?

  2. Jesus May 25, 2015 at 5:40 pm #

    Creativity is being lost, reforms do not have the educational principle to take over the system, Abolishing art in schools is creating robots for an economic “stability”.

  3. Limoo October 22, 2015 at 12:01 pm #

    A very strong wall should be built in the mind to separate education in its purest form vs education as a means of livelyhood. The former makes us human while the latter makes us think we are what we do for a living. Someone slaughtered education, sucked life out of it, overroasted it and served it in form of careers to the hungry.

Visit Our Facebook PageVisit Our Facebook Page